The recently launched 00Kev makes more sense when viewed as the latest stage of a development programme rather than as a single new frame. We have been determined to bring more elements of fabrication back to our HQ in Melbourne, Australia. We are proud that it is now available to purchase.

Curve has been progressively combining carbon and 3D-printed titanium for several years. We started with relatively contained applications, built the manufacturing knowledge around them, tested what we were making and then increased the amount of carbon and the complexity of the 3D-printed titanium parts as our experience grew. The 00Kev is the first Curve frame where that work comes together as a complete carbon-tube and 3D-printed titanium lug construction.

It is also the most manufacturing-intensive frame we have produced. A lot of what makes it interesting is hidden once the frame is assembled: double-lap bond interfaces, internal printed structures, adhesive control features, part identification, hose routing paths, a steering limiter and the negotiation required to make the titanium parts printable in the first place.

The finished frame is intended for gravel racing, with a more aggressive position than our titanium GXR and clearance for tyres up to 29 x 2.4". Those specifications are relatively easy to explain. The way this frame came to life will take a little longer.

The path from AIR to 00Kev

Our first meaningful step into this type of hybrid construction came through the AIR Kev and AIR Belgie.

With those bikes we brought the bonding of the carbon seat tube into Curve's own workshop. That was important. Bonding carbon into a titanium structure is simple enough as a concept, but producing reliable joints repeatedly means controlling the fit between parts, surface preparation, adhesive application, assembly, cure and finishing. Doing that work ourselves gave us direct experience rather than leaving the process entirely with a production partner.

The AIR programme also introduced more complex 3D-printed titanium components. One of these was the Power Pyramid, a printed titanium structure welded into the bottom bracket area to increase stiffness through a heavily loaded part of the frame. It gave us experience designing additive parts around a specific structural job rather than using 3D printing just for the sake of it.

The AIR Belgie 3D pushed that further with a fully 3D-printed titanium head tube. The head tube is a good place to learn the limitations of additive manufacturing. It has bearing interfaces that require accuracy, several load paths entering the part from different directions and a significant influence on both the structural and visual character of the frame. Testing of this model gave us more confidence in our approach to designing the most critical part of a bike frame, the downtube - headtube connection.

CarboKev was the next major step. It moved the programme from isolated carbon sections to a frame using a carbon down tube, seat tube and chainstays while retaining a largely titanium upper structure. By that stage we were doing substantially more bonding and learning how different tube shapes, joint geometries and assembly sequences behaved in production rather than only in CAD. The testing programme also gave us the opportunity to dismantle frames, replace tubes, replace lugs and retest them. Each step gave us a more detailed understanding of this fabrication process and built our confidence.

The 00Kev extends that work to a complete lug-and-tube architecture. Carbon is used for the main structural tubes and 3D-printed titanium is concentrated at the junctions where complex geometry, load transfer, bearing interfaces, drivetrain clearance or hardware integration make it useful.

None of those earlier projects was a disposable experiment. Each project produced a new model that we are very much proud of. Each gave us another piece of the manufacturing process that we now use on the 00Kev.

Why carbon tubes and titanium lugs

The material choice is fairly pragmatic. Carbon allows us to control section size, shape, stiffness and weight efficiently along the relatively simple lengths of the frame. The 00Kev uses a large down tube and substantial carbon chainstays in the lower part of the frame where stiffness and power transfer are priorities. Higher in the frame, the top tube is heavily ovalised and the carbon seat stays are deliberately minimal, reducing weight and allowing more compliance into the structure.

Titanium is used where the geometry gets difficult. The head tube junctions, bottom bracket assembly, dropouts and chainstay transitions all involve shapes that would be cumbersome to produce from straight tubing. Additive manufacturing lets us put material around the load paths, create internal and external bond surfaces and gives us the design freedom to juggle the various constraints that exist in frame design. The bottom bracket assembly is always a particular challenge. It is there that competing needs of a wide tyre clearance, large front chainring, a narrow Q-factor, and being a solid and stiff platform under load, all collide.

At the chainstays we use small 3D-printed titanium sections that we call Bend-Aids. The printed Bend-Aids let us create bends in the heavily ovalised chainstays needed to balance crank, chainring, tyre and heel clearance. What began as a prototype solution proved useful enough to remain in the production architecture - our early customers have insisted on it.

The lug-and-tube method gives a relatively simple path to completely custom geometry. We can alter frame geometry without creating a complete new carbon mould set that would be needed for carbon construction. With carefully constructed parametric 3D design, files for new lugs based on custom geometry can be created quickly and sent off for printing.

Double-lap joints

The basic construction method is established engineering. We are not claiming to have invented titanium-lugged carbon frames or adhesive-bonded tube construction. What we have concentrated on is how we execute it.

The production 00Kev uses double-lap bonded joints throughout the principal carbon-to-titanium connections. Instead of terminating a carbon tube against a single bonded overlap, a double-lap joint secures it across two bond surfaces. For a similar overlap length this gives roughly twice the adhesive contact area and produces a more balanced load path through the joint. That second point is important.

Structural adhesives generally work very well when the joint is arranged so that the load is carried predominantly in shear. Performance is diminished when the joint geometry introduces large peel loads at its edge. A double-lap arrangement essentially removes peel stress, transferring all the load to more shear forces more uniformly distributed through the bond area.

The technique has a long history outside bicycles. Adhesively bonded double-lap joints have been studied and used in aircraft structures for decades, in part because they allow a strong joint to be produced without paying the weight penalty associated with a much heavier mechanical connection. 

There is also good precedent within the bicycle industry. A number of manufacturers use bonded lug-and-tube construction, but Atherton Bikes is particularly relevant to us because it has pushed 3D-printed titanium lugs, carbon tubes and double-lap joints throughout frames intended for very serious mountain-bike use. Its enduro and downhill bikes operate in a load environment well beyond normal gravel riding; World Cup downhill is often close to controlled tumbling down a rocky mountainside.

We looked closely at that precedent. Our frame design, lug geometry, tubes, manufacturing processes and test programme are our own, but there is value in recognising where an engineering method already has a substantial body of work behind it.

While bikes do not face the same loads or operating temperature ranges as aircraft, care must be taken in choosing adhesives. We can’t have bikes debonding in the back of a car on a hot Australian summer day. Our preferred adhesive for 00Kev, while tricky to work with, does not materially reduce in strength across a wide temperature range.

The inconvenient part of double-lap construction

Double-lap joints make the frame easier to trust structurally and considerably more difficult to manufacture. A single socket is relatively straightforward to design for additive manufacturing. A double-lap connection requires narrow internal geometry so that the carbon tube can sit between two titanium bond surfaces. On the 00Kev several lugs have these sockets pointing in different directions.

A metal 3D printer does not operate outside of the laws of gravity - yet. And so gravity must be taken into account when designing printable parts. People often have a view that anything can be 3D printed, but that is not true. When 3D-printing a structure each layer needs sufficient material beneath it to support the next layer, or additional support structures have to be printed with the part. Those supports are removed after printing.

That becomes difficult when the feature requiring support is inside a narrow double-lap socket. There is little value in printing a geometrically perfect internal surface if the support structure needed to create it cannot subsequently be removed without destroying the part.

Build orientation therefore becomes part of engineering each lug. We have to consider the direction of each socket, allowable overhangs, support access, surface finish, post-processing and the critical load directions at the same time.

The down tube to head tube connection is a good example. That junction is already one of the most highly loaded areas of a conventional bicycle frame. On the 00Kev it is also one of the most complicated printed parts because the lug has to provide the required head tube and down tube geometry while maintaining the double-lap bond architecture and remaining manufacturable. There are orientations that make one surface easier to print while making another effectively impossible. And changing the lug to solve a printing problem can alter its stiffness, weight or appearance. 

This is why we don't regard additive manufacturing as a process where we finish a CAD file and send it to a printer. Printability is part of the component design from quite early in the process.

What goes into the printed parts

The titanium parts are 3D-printed in Grade 5 titanium. Bearing seats, threads and other critical interfaces are then post-processed as required rather than relying on the raw printed surface for every dimension.

The external shape is only a portion of the CAD work. Wall thicknesses change through the lugs according to the job the section is doing. Internal sockets have to accommodate the carbon tube, adhesive and assembly tolerances. Bearing and bottom bracket interfaces need appropriate material for final machining.

Some of the features are only fractions of a millimetre in size. We have designed features down to around 0.3 mm, including small bond-separation nodules used to help control the bonded interface.

We also print identification and revision information into parts where appropriate. Version control becomes increasingly important once several generations of a lug exist. A component can look essentially identical externally while having a different internal wall, bond feature or geometry.

Another unseen feature is the steering limiter that we’ve built into the toptube-headtube lug. This limiter is there to stop the top tube getting destroyed from an impact with the handlebar in the case of a crash. The limiter allows the normal steering while riding but it stops the rotation of the handlebar before hitting the top tube - something that’s only important in a crash scenario. It was easy to incorporate this feature once designed but it’s a nice detail that will extend a 00Kev frame’s life.

It also has to look stunning

Additive manufacturing gives enormous geometric freedom, and it is easy to use that freedom badly. 3D-printing means that frame components become functional art. A structurally correct lug can still look ugly, or obviously generated around a collection of engineering constraints. We spend a large amount of time on the exterior surfaces after the main structural requirements have been established.

Some say that the dropouts are the signature of a frame builder, and they receive a lot of attention in our design process. The dropouts scallops are not the reason the dropout works, but the elegant final form has been considered in the same CAD model as the functional features.

The same applies to the transitions between the carbon and titanium, the contours around the bottom bracket and the shape of the head tube lugs. The 00Kev head tube appears tapered from some angles even though the carbon head tube section itself isn't. That comes from the shape of the printed lower lug and the careful positioning of the carbon section.

We don't see a conflict between engineering and appearance here. The structural elements need to be correct first, but a bicycle frame remains a prized possession that will be admired for years. A bike of the caliber of 00Kev must look stunning.

The paint work follows the same approach. Some of our current finishes use transparent tints over the carbon rather than hiding the material under an opaque colour. The carbon weave, printed titanium and transitions between materials remain part of the appearance of the frame rather than something that needs to be disguised.

Tuning the carbon tubeset

The carbon tubing is sourced from a specialist New Zealand supplier with experience in high-performance marine composite structures.

At this stage of the programme we are using established tube constructions, chosen for their particular use, rather than pretending we have already extracted every possible benefit from custom carbon lay-up. This leaves us room for future development in fibre orientation, local wall thickness and tube-specific laminates.

For the current 00Kev we have concentrated on selecting tube dimensions and shapes to do particular jobs within the frame. The oversized down tube and chainstays make the lower structure deliberately stiff. They carry pedalling and drivetrain loads through the head tube, bottom bracket and rear axle with minimal unwanted movement.

The upper frame uses a different approach. The top tube is heavily ovalised and the seat stays are extremely minimal. The objective there is to avoid unnecessary material and build some compliance into the structure for a little extra comfort on the longest gravel races.

That combination also suits the intended use of the bike. The 00Kev is a race-oriented gravel frame, but current gravel racing covers a very wide range of surfaces. A frame can spend a couple of hours on high-speed hardpack and the next on terrain that would once have been considered cross-country MTB. Tyre clearance therefore extends to 29 x 2.4", while the geometry remains substantially more race-focused than our titanium GXR (aka Kevin).

The front end is lower and the position more aggressive than the GXR. The intention is to retain predictable handling with a large gravel tyre while putting the rider in a position suitable for fast racing.

Internal routing and the Neo Plug

Full brake-hose integration created another set of structural constraints.

The production frame is designed around our Race 415 fork with the Neo Plug, a 3D-printed titanium sleeve bonded inside the fork steerer. It provides the reinforcement and geometry required to route the brake hose internally without moving to a substantially larger upper headset bearing simply to create cable space. In our view, a smaller upper headset bearing results in a more elegant silhouette.

This arrangement has been independently tested as a fork and steerer system.

There is one practical consequence for the customer and the mechanic: the steerer length has to be established properly before final assembly. External routing gives considerable freedom to adjust stem height later. A fully integrated system is less forgiving, so we treat fit and final steerer dimension as part of the frame setup rather than leaving it as an afterthought. However, this is intended to be an aggressive race bike, so we make no apologies for this constraint.

The printed parts also include internal cable management around the bottom bracket and other small components that are easy to overlook when looking at the completed bike. One of the benefits of additive manufacturing is that these pieces can be designed for the exact space rather than adapted from generic hardware.

Testing the construction, not just the concept

Our confidence in this frame doesn't come from the fact that carbon and titanium have been bonded successfully before. The particular tubes, joints, printed parts, adhesive process and frame geometry still have to be validated as a system.

The 00Kev completed the full suite of applicable standard ISO frame tests. Impact testing was initially carried out at the levels we normally apply to our gravel frames, after which we increased the impact severity to the levels we use for MTB validation. The same frame met those higher impact requirements as well.

That extra testing was deliberate. The bike is designed for gravel racing, but tyre clearance up to 2.4" and the way modern gravel bikes are being ridden mean that defining the structure around smooth-road assumptions would make little sense.

Testing has also fed directly back into the manufacturing process.

If a prototype behaves differently from what we expected, we need to know whether the cause is the carbon tube, lug geometry, bond, adhesive application, assembly tolerance or something else. That is another reason for carrying part revisions through the printed components and maintaining control over the bonding work in-house.

A successful laboratory test doesn't mean a frame is indestructible. It does give us a repeatable way of testing the design and the production process against the same defined loads that have been used in frame production for many years. Passing these tests gives us confidence in our design and fabrication processes.

Learning how to repair what we build

One useful consequence of the development programme has been learning how to take these frames apart.

Removing a bonded carbon tube from a double-lap titanium lug is not particularly fun work. Carbon and cured structural adhesive have to be removed from a narrow socket without damaging the titanium surfaces that need to be retained. It is dusty, slow and requires considerably more care than simply cutting a damaged frame up and starting again.

We now have practical experience doing it. That knowledge is valuable during development because a frame with one damaged or superseded tube does not necessarily have to be discarded. Where damage is suitable for repair and the titanium structure remains serviceable, being able to remove the affected carbon section and prepare the lug for a replacement tube offers a much better outcome than disposing of an entire frame. It reduces waste, preserves expensive printed parts and makes a premium frame more supportable over a long service life.

Not every damaged frame will be repairable, and assessment still has to come first. Designing and manufacturing a product while also learning how to repair it has nevertheless become an important part of this programme.

Made in Australia

The frame is the product of several specialist suppliers rather than an attempt to pretend that every process is most efficiently done under one roof. Our 3D-printed titanium parts are produced with specialist manufacturing partners in China. Part of the post-processing work is occasionally carried out here in Melbourne. The carbon tubing comes from New Zealand at this stage.

The titanium lugs and tubes are turned into a finished frame in Melbourne, Australia at Curve’s HQ. It is there that part preparation, frame assembly and alignment, bonding and finishing are carried out. That is the part of the process we particularly wanted to bring in-house because it gives us direct control over the interfaces between materials and allows what we learn from testing and prototype work to flow immediately back into assembly.

The paintwork is carried out by Curve co-founder Steve Varga at Candy Factory Paintworks. In a short space of time, Steve has mastered the craft of painting bike frames. The 00Kev paint options are Steve’s own creations.

Where this programme has reached

The AIR Kev and AIR Belgie taught us how to bring carbon bonding into our own workshop. The Power Pyramid and AIR Belgie 3D developed our understanding of structural 3D-printed titanium. CarboKev increased the amount of carbon in the frame and forced us to become better at tube replacement, bonding and repair. The 00Kev is the culmination of all that work, a frame that we proudly make in Melbourne.

There is still plenty to learn. Carbon tube design can be taken further. Printed structures can become lighter. Bond geometry, assembly tooling and repair processes will continue to develop. Lead times will reduce.

But for now we’re proud of the work our team has done to release 00Kev into the wild.

00Kev technical summary

  • Carbon-tube frame with Grade 5 3D-printed titanium structural lugs
  • Double-lap carbon-to-titanium bonded joints throughout the principal frame connections
  • Structural adhesive selected for strength, chemical resistance and temperature performance
  • Printed bond-interface features down to approximately 0.3 mm
  • Integrated headset (IS42/IS52)
  • T47 bottom bracket with integrated printed titanium yoke
  • Printed titanium chainstay Bend-Aids
  • SRAM UDH and Transmission-compatible printed titanium dropouts
  • Steering limiter built into toptube–headtube lug
  • Direct 160 mm rear brake-caliper mounting
  • Carbon tubeset: Oversized carbon down tube and chainstays, heavily ovalised carbon top tube, extremely minimal carbon seat stays
  • Clearance for tyres up to 29 x 2.4"
  • Clearance for 50t chainring (1x)
  • Race-focused gravel geometry with a lower front end than the GXR
  • Full internal brake-hose routing
  • Race 415 carbon fork with tested 3D-printed titanium Neo Plug steerer reinforcement
  • Conventional seatpost or integrated seatpost upon request
  • Gravel testing standard
  • Made in Australia
  • Lead time: 9 months
  • Frameset pricing: AUD14,000 (incl 10% Australian GST)
  • Complete bike pricing: AUD29,000 (incl 10% Australian GST) for a typical high end build including SRAM Red Xplr, Carbon G5T wheelset with DT Swiss 180 hubs, Curve Carbon Race Walmer Bar. Contact us or your local Curve dealer to discuss build options.
    1 out of ...
    Back to blog

    Leave a comment

    Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.